Talk:Time Cube
I wrote this article because someone is obviously interested enough in it to jam it into our universe.
I wrote this article because someone is obviously interested enough in it to jam it into our universe.
Not because I believe it is credible at all.
If anything, I am being wildly too fair to it. But Gene Ray did get invited to talk at MIT, so, whatever, he can have one page... it's useful to compare his theory to more credible theories, since a lot of people are reading http://timecube.com and wondering if there's any validity at all.
I continue to disclaim this theory, but have no objection to it being described here. Much worse crap is allowed to pass for scholarship over at EN:, which is the worst of the Wikipedias. Their low standards and personal edit wars and ad hominem censorship should not be allowed here.
Why does it oppose Platonism? I think one could argue that timecube is the perfect idea behind the universe, and gene ray states that it cannot be fully comprehended by any human. Isn't that compatible with platonism?
Watch out for TimeCubeGuy
Someone often edits the page on the English Wikipedia to be favourable to Timecube, despite an arbitration commite deciding all his edits are not balanced and should be reverted as soon as they are made.
He mostly comes from IPs in Australia, specifically Australian universities.
You can read about it at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TimecubeGuy
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.