Talk:Number

No. This will NOT do. This article is not accurate, and I'm not sure how to fix it. --Juuitchan

Untitled

No. This will NOT do. This article is not accurate, and I'm not sure how to fix it. --Juuitchan

I've added an accuracy dispute notice. Angela 18:29, 6 Feb 2004 (UTC)

I think this is accurate, though it is unsimple. I have an A level in maths and have also done maths as part of a degree that includes Economics, I suggest this is changed to unsiple and put on peer revue. --Sim 18:30, 8 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Currently, this article claims that numbers and numerals are both symbols.
However, the English Wikipeda en:number draws a distinction between "number" and "numeral" (a number is the value of a numeral).
Using its definition, the symbol "12", the symbol "binary 1100", the cardinal numeral "twelve", and the ordinal numeral "twelfth" -- all are numerals that refer to the number twelve.
Should we draw the same distinction in this Simple English article, or is this the sort of hair-splitting distinction that makes things unnecessarily difficult to understand?
--DavidCary (talk) 20:00, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Simple English is about using simple words to describe concepts; it is not about being inaccurate. It is about avoiding complex words.--Eptalon (talk) 20:04, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

long scale

I find the section regarding the long scale rather confusing. I suggest to move this into a separate article and only leave a note that it existed once in English and is still used in many other European languages (languages not "nations").

There-is-life-on-mars (talk) 05:31, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

concepsychologicall

Is this an appropriate word for the Simple English Wikipedia? I hope somebody can help!

ခရမ်းသူလေးခရမ်းသူလေး 1.46.82.209 (talk) 21:21, 25 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

طے

طط طب چینی طب ~2026-22269-87 (talk) 23:43, 10 April 2026 (UTC)Reply


Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.