Talk:Light

I've said that light is sometimes called EM, but I'm not sure what should be done. Should this be moved to EM, should EM redirect here, or are they sufficently…

Talk:Light

I've said that light is sometimes called EM, but I'm not sure what should be done. Should this be moved to EM, should EM redirect here, or are they sufficently different to warrent 2 articles? (IMO they are exactly the same thing, but some people may argue that light only really means visible EM). -- Tango 11:34, 19 May 2004 (UTC)Reply

Looking at the interlangiage links on en:light and en:Electromagnetic radiation, a lot of languages have these two as separate articles, so I think we should too. Angela 16:38, 19 May 2004 (UTC)Reply
Seems like a good reason. When I find time I'll go and read the en articles and see what they put where. -- Tango 17:02, 19 May 2004 (UTC)Reply
nice 2.50.185.127 (talk) 08:01, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

To be or not to be a stub

I still disagree this entry created in 2004 should remain a stub under Simple policy. ONaNcle (talk) 08:26, 3 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

No, I don't think it should be. There's lot of hard-working effort put into this article and tho' it would be better if more expanded, certainly...it doesn't deserve the epithet of a stub anymore.Classical Esther (talk) 06:54, 11 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

' Can photons be a liquid'?

The article should maybe say something about that.--If anyone writes something simple (and true), then i plan to add sources.--If you are 'shy to write in the article', then write on this talk-page.--I will gladly take a look at that.--
Brainstorming:
"Photons can not be a liquid, but ..."

. Something like that, might be how, (adequate) text might start.--Not sure that i will do the entire thing, in 2026 or earlier. ~2025-27264-18 (talk) 12:39, 1 October 2025 (UTC)Reply


Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.