Talk:Closed source

This and other article look almost identical and appear to have no contradicting information. Might be better to just have one and have them both contain the sa…

This and other article look almost identical and appear to have no contradicting information. Might be better to just have one and have them both contain the same info. Computer Fizz (talk) 04:41, 9 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Propriety software is by far the better-known term, and should be the title of the merged article. Go ahead and do it if you agree. The reason we get this kind of double article is that editors do not do a proper search in the first place. Macdonald-ross (talk) 05:54, 9 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
Agreed 199.88.96.49 (talk) 20:40, 29 August 2025 (UTC)Reply


Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.