Talk:Apocrypha

Its difficult to keep a balance on these issues. What does one do with statements such as

Its difficult to keep a balance on these issues.
What does one do with statements such as

  • Irrelevant: ‘The Apocrypha was written in the times of the exile between the period of 400 -> 0 AD, where in religious view, God had stopped sending prophets due to their disobedience.’
  • False: The majority of the Apocrypha was not written in the Native languages of the Bible, such as Hebrew or Greek
  • Speculative: Jewish sects and historical evidence may prove the apocrypha as works of the Devil and are not of God
  • Contentious: Antioch, Syria where True Christians of the Early Church had in their possession of the Holy Sciptures in manuscript format, highly disregarded manuscripts that were found corrupted in Alexandria Egypt.


--Mariner 12:57, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

"This is fake." ???

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In the first paragraph, "Some of the apocrypha were written at a later date, and were therefore not included. This is fake."

Am I missing something (totally possible) or should this be removed? Vs604 (talk) 08:24, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Related Information : Talk:Apocrypha


Talk:Apocrypha
Senin, 2025-03-17 07:19:06

these issues. What does one do with statements such as Irrelevant: ‘The Apocrypha was written in the times of the exile between the period of 400 -> 0 AD...

Click to read more »
Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.