Talk:The Weeknd
I think elements of this could have been reverted, but I think reverting all of these edits without any comment wasn't necessary. A lot of useful changes by …
| This article is about a person who is alive, and so it must follow our rules for biographies of living persons. Controversial content about living persons that does not have any sources or is poorly sourced must be removed straight away from the article and its talk page, especially if it harms their reputation. If such content is repeatedly added to the page or if there are other concerns related to this rule, report it on the Administrators' noticeboard. |
 | This article was edited by students as part of a class project that ended on May 2013. Please assume good faith. If there are any problems, you are encouraged to contact an administrator. More information can be found here. |
I think elements of this could have been reverted, but I think reverting all of these edits without any comment wasn't necessary. A lot of useful changes by Matthewishere0 have been reverted, and by no means are we looking at vandalism here. Thoughts? --IWI (talk) 17:45, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Ah this is now resolved I believe, since the user self-reverted. --IWI (talk) 17:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- @ImprovedWikiImprovment: - So because they reverted, does that mean all of my original edits are back? Matthewishere0 (talk) 20:52, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Yes; they have restored the page to the state before the revert. --IWI (talk) 20:55, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- @ImprovedWikiImprovment: - So because they reverted, does that mean all of my original edits are back? Matthewishere0 (talk) 20:52, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Comment
Text is ridiculously overlong and complex. Whatever the intentions, overall it looks like an ad for the person. I see an IP was allowed to add 67,778 bytes en bloc. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:55, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- Given the complexity of the 70k pasted in, I just reverted back to a version before it was added and did some cleanup. It will result in the article being out of date in many areas but overall it is at least readable.. I also added in the current en version of the infobox. Those are very prose light so it not being SE is reaaly not a big issue and it does help with the article being out of date. Also added a cat and did a ref fix. Pure Evil (talk) 09:36, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.